\n\n

When reviewers request revision: a practical response strategy for authors

A detailed guide to manuscript preparation, editorial screening, ethics declarations, the post-acceptance 395 EUR fee, DOI fields and publication verification.

A strong research project still needs a complete submission file. Editors first encounter the title, abstract, author details, keywords and references, so clarity at that stage can make the scientific contribution easier to assess.

Building a complete submission

The online form accepts PDF, DOC and DOCX files and separately collects the abstract and keywords. Keeping the title, author order, affiliations and abstract identical in the file and the form reduces avoidable technical questions.

The first editorial screening

Official guidance says submissions may be screened for scope, academic suitability, originality, ethical compliance, technical quality and completeness. Decisions can include minor or major revision, further academic evaluation, acceptance into the publication workflow or a decision not to proceed.

Acceptance and the fee sequence

Separating payment from editorial decision-making is an important integrity safeguard. Current Science Georgia states that the 395 EUR fee enters the workflow only after the manuscript is accepted for publication processing.

Verifiable records after publication

Published records can be searched by title, author, DOI or Zenodo number, article code and keyword. The journal publishes under ISSN 2667-9515 and maintains year-and-issue archives plus online verification tools.

A final author checklist

Authors should also confirm that the manuscript is not simultaneously under review elsewhere and that conflict-of-interest, funding and ethics information is present where required.

Researchers can submit a manuscript for editorial consideration through the official form at https://csi.ge/submit-manuscript/. Preparation requirements are set out in the author guidelines, while csi.ge provides access to the journal and article records.

Editorial note: This article is based on Current Science Georgia’s publicly available author and publication policies. Submission does not guarantee acceptance; every manuscript remains subject to editorial and academic evaluation.

Tags: Current Science Georgia, research article, academic publishing, peer review, DOI, ISSN 2667-9515.